Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reed v. Buckel, et al.
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A Buckel, S. Steadman, T Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tran v. Martinez
as 3:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Ba T. Tran
Defendant:
T. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle Davis v. James Corcoran, et al
as 22-55959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES CORCORAN, Correctional Officer, J. PULIDO, Correctional Officer, R. SKOG, Correctional Officer and others
Saticoy Bay LLC Series 1003 Dover Glen Drive v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv02108
Plaintiff:
Saticoy Bay LLC Series 1003 Dover Glen Drive
Defendant:
United States of America and Andrea T Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Ronald Renteria v. Cuevas, et al
as 21-56121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD DAVE RENTERIA
Defendant / Appellee:
CUEVAS, 3rd Watch Correctional Officer, BYRNES, 3rd Watch Correctional Officer, KAKO, 3rd Watch Correctional Officer and others
Renteria v. Cuevas et al
as 3:2021cv01507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dave Renteria
Defendant:
Cuevas, Byrnes, Kako and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robert McCullock v. N. Scharr, et al
as 21-55804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. MCCULLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
N. SCHARR, Sgt., H. FERREL, Lt., T. MARTINEZ, Capt. and others
German Martinez v. William Barr
as 20-72852
Petitioner:
GERMAN T. MARTINEZ, AKA German Trujillo Martinez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
