Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Teague v. Keenan and Associates
as 2:2024cv01609
Plaintiff:
Nathan Teague
Defendant:
Keenan & Associates and Kennan and Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Teague v. Bayer-Bayer
as 3:2023cv04605
Plaintiff:
JaRon Shawn La'V Teague
Defendant:
Bayer-Bayer eT, AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Young Automotive Group, LLC v. Smyer, et al.
as 4:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Young Automotive Group, LLC
Defendant:
Teague Smyer and Lease End, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robert Anderson, et al v. USA
as 22-55965
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDERSON, DIXIE ATWOOD, HOLLY ATWOOD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Delta C, LP v. Shimazu et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Delta C, LP
Defendant:
Stephanie Shimazu, Nathan DaValle, Jamin Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Delta C, LP, a California limited partnership v. Shimazu et al
as 2:2022at00173
Plaintiff:
Delta C, LP, a California limited partnership
Defendant:
Stephanie Shimazu, Nathan DaValle, Jamin Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Teague v. Clark County et al
as 2:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Teague
Defendant:
Clark County, Christa Broka, Talia L Walkenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
