Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Durgan v. U-Haul International Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01565
Plaintiff:
Felicia Durgan, Evan Hatchell, Kasio Young and others
Defendant:
U-Haul International Incorporated
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Chris Bagley, Joseph Laventure, Jr., Daniel Tooker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jason Page v. S. Gates, et al
as 20-16978
Defendant / Appellee:
P. VIRK, Head Physician Revrs Medical Executive at Valley State Prison, A. GALINDO, Registered Nurse P&S Advisory/Consultant, K. TOOR, Physician at Valley State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON PAGE
(PC) Wilson v. Torres et al
as 1:2020cv01430
Defendant:
Harpreet Gill, Wei Gu, Rachelle Torres and others
Plaintiff:
Ian Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Munoz v. Toor et al
as 1:2020cv01201
Plaintiff:
James Munoz
Defendant:
Monivirin Son, Dr. Kiran Toor and Dr. V. Mununuri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stanley v. Toor
as 1:2020cv01078
Plaintiff:
Deonray Stanley
Defendant:
Dr. K. Toor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Page v. Gates et al
as 1:2019cv01359
Defendant:
J. Ballesil, H. Gill, H. Longia and others
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) McNeil v. Toor et al
as 1:2019cv01257
Defendant:
Pal Virk, Tin-Aung Shwe, Kiran Toor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
