Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 76
United States of America v. Approximately $57,939.48 seized from J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. account number 781275651 et al
as 2:2024at00644
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $57,939.48 seized from J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. account number 781275651, Approximately $20,664.26 seized from J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. account number 000000230313733, Approximately $25,787.06 seized from PNC Bank, National Association account number 3915958077 and others
USA v. Approx. $57,939.48 seized from J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024mc00207
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $57,939.48 seized from J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. account number 781275651, Approximately $20,664.26 seized from J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. account number 000000230313733, Approximately $25,787.06 seized from PNC Bank, National Association account number 3915958077 and others
Claimant: Fiona Walshe, TP Systems, LLC, Christopher Stephen and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403 et al
as 2:2024at00632
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403, Approximately $13,738.24 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009438, Approximately $1,378,783.42 seized from UBS AG account number GE 46907 and others
USA v. Approx. $73,212.71, et al.,
as 2:2024mc00204
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403, Approximately $13,738.24 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009438, Approximately $1,378,783.42 seized from UBS AG account number GE 46907 and others
Claimant: Run It Up, Inc. and Won It All, Inc.
Richard Agay et al v. UBS Financial Services Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02975
Plaintiff: Richard Agay and Arline Agay
Defendant: UBS Financial Services Inc., Does A through Z, inclusive and Greg Geller
Interested Party: UBS Americas Inc., UBS AG, UBS Group AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant: LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee: INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
Claiforina Asphalt Production, Inc. v. UBS AG, London Branch et al
as 2:2021cv03114
Defendant: DOES 1-50, Inclusive,, UBS AG, a public company organized under the laws of Switzerland, UBS AG, London Branch, a UK Establishment of UBS AG and others
Plaintiff: Claiforina Asphalt Production, Inc. and California Asphalt Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kathleen Johnson, et al v. UBS AG We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56253
Defendant / Appellee: UBS AG
Plaintiff / Appellant: KATHLEEN K. JOHNSON, Individually and as Trustee of The Annabell M. Palmer Family Trust and JUDITH WOODARD, Individually and as Trustee of The Annabell M. Palmer Family Trust
McCarthy et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05832
Plaintiff: Brenda Davis, Pamela Faust, Sondra Russell and others
Defendant: Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Andrew S. Hennigan v. McKinsey and Co., Inc.
as 2:2020cv01582
Defendant: Stuart Skeates, Jon Garcia, Jesse York and others
Plaintiff: Andrew S. Hennigan
Petitioner: Jose R. Gonzalez
Interested Party: Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of all Title III Debtors (Other Than COFINA & PBA)
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?