Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00894
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Concely Mendez Rojas, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-35988
Defendant / Appellee: TONY H. PHAM, Acting Director of United States Customs and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ELMER GEOVANNI RODRIGUEZ ESCOBAR, LIDIA MARGARITA LOPEZ ORELLANA, CONCELY DEL CARMEN MENDEZ ROJAS and others
Claimant: ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY
KQED INC. v. United States Customs and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2020cv01628
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Customs and Immigration Services
Plaintiff: KQED INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00890
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00872
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-35443
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yun Kwon v. United States Customs and Immi
as 08-16175
Petitioner - Appellant: YUN SUNG KYEONG KWON
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE
Kyeong v. United State Custom and Immigration Service
as 2:2008cv00091
Petitioner: Kwon Sung Kyeong, Yun
Respondent: United State Custom and Immigration Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?