Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hawthorne v. O'Malley
as 24-1982
Plaintiff:
CHERYL V. L. HAWTHORNE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
S.L. et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
S. L., V. L. and Carolyn Campbell
Defendant:
County of Riverside, DOES 1-10, inclusive. and Does 11-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawthorne v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv03530
Defendant:
Cheryl V. L. Hawthorne, Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06835
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ubisoft, Inc. v. J.V.L. et al
as 2:2019cv09132
Defendant:
Sandra Rijken, Mizusoft Ltd., J. V. L. and others
Plaintiff:
Ubisoft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hawthorne v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv01130
Plaintiff:
Cheryl V. L. Hawthorne
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lopez v. The Hillshire Brands Company et al
as 3:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Lanette Louise Lopez , Pillar Elan Lopez and S. V. L.
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply Inc., Basco Drywall & Painting Company, The Hillshire Brands Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Stanislaus County, et al
as 14-16652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS ALLEN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
STANISLAUS COUNTY, MARK PUTHUFF, Former Sheriff, ADAM CHRISTIANSON, Sheriff and others
Allen v. Stanislaus County et al
as 1:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Stanislaus County, Mark Puthuff, Adam Christianson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nancy Butano et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2011cv00691
Plaintiff:
Nancy Butano, D. V. L. and M. C. L.
Defendant:
County of Orange, Does, Loan English and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
