Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gallardo v. McVay et al
as 2:2023at01172
Petitioner:
Eric Gallardo
Respondent:
Warden Matthew McVay and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Triplett v. McVay
as 1:2023cv05452
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Triplett
Respondent:
Acting Warden Matthew McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Buren v. Gee et al
as 5:2022cv01563
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
S. Gee, T. Lemon, Warden Matthew Atchley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harris v. Alchley et al
as 5:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harris
Defendant:
Warden Matthew Alchley and Dr. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Atchley et al
as 3:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Harris
Defendant:
Warden Matthew Atchley, T. Vang, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luna v. Atchley
as 5:2021cv10003
Petitioner:
Jose Juan Luna, Jr.
Respondent:
Acting Warden Matthew Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
v. Smith et al
as 2:2021at01077
Defendant:
Gilbert Earl Smith, Warden Matthew Atchley and People of the State of California Real Party in Interest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Atchley et al
as 2:2021at01076
Petitioner:
Gilbert Earl Smith
Respondent:
Warden Matthew Atchley and People of the State of California Real Party in Interest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Atchley et al
as 3:2021cv06577
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jay Harris
Defendant:
Warden Matthew Atchley, Kathleen Allison, T. Vang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blacknell, III v. Atchley
as 4:2021cv04508
Respondent:
Acting Warden Matthew Atchley
Petitioner:
Joseph Blacknell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
