Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Blenders Eyewear LLC v. Le Ventures LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blenders Eyewear, LLC
Defendant:
Le Ventures, LLC, Neven Eyewear LLC, Neven Eyewear, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Nuzee, Inc. v. Steeped, Inc.,
as 3:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
NuZee, Inc. a Delaware public benefit corporation doing business as Coffee Blenders
Defendant:
Steeped, Inc., a Delaware public benefit corporation doing business as Steeped Coffee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Steeped, Inc. v. Nuzee, Inc.
as 4:2019cv03763
Defendant:
Nuzee, Inc. and Nuzee, Inc. a Nevada Corporation doing business as Coffee Blenders
Plaintiff:
Steeped, Inc. and Steeped, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Steeped Coffee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Beaumanor, LLC et al v. Booster Juice Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2012cv01308
Respondent:
AW Holdings, Inc., Jonathan Amack, Booster Juice Limited Partnership and others
Petitioner:
Beaumanor, LLC, Blender Harmony, LLC, Grayfield, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Ernest Miller v. Blender Magazine
as 09-16857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
BLENDER MAGAZINES
Miller v. Blender Magazines
as 1:2007cv01042
Plaintiff:
Ernest Miller
Defendant:
Blender Magazines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
