Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,312
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment/Reemployment Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Defendant: Mark Harrell and Larry Nixon
Plaintiff: Michael Farrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Brice (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: Tonya Robinson
Defendant: Jay S. Brice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Turner v. City of Clanton Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff: Bobby Joe Turner
Defendant: Austin Turner, Joshua Marley, Chilton County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McQueen v. Flowers (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Tenika McQueen
Defendant: Felicia Franklin Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?