Cases 131 - 140 of 4,260
Melton v. Houston County (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Houston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Rump (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheila Rump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. U. S. Department of Education (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Frances Elizabeth Maddox
Defendant:
Southern Union State Community College and U. S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ballard v. State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stacey Ballard and Stacey Ballard
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Daniel v. Empire Properties (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Empire Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Montgomery Police Department (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Alabama Crime Victims Compensation (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Alabama Crime Victims Compensation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pimenta et al v. Thornton et al
as 2:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Pedro Da Silva Pimenta, Heather Staples and Pedro Miguel Da Silva Pimenta
Defendant:
City of Eclectic, Charles Thornton and Charles T. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
