Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Talley v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Adrian Fitzgerald Talley, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah Toney, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ezell v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2018cv00697
Plaintiff:
Adrian Maurice Ezell
Defendant:
Debra Toney, Steven T. Marshall and Bibb County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephens v. Woods (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Adrian Stephens
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Bolling et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Adrian Stewart
Defendant:
Leon Bolling and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moultry v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00481
Plaintiff:
Adrian Moultry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Duncan v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kermit Duncan
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Eric Bascomb, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00374
Plaintiff:
Floyd F. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers , Derrick Carter and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Movant:
Adrian Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purnell v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01045
Plaintiff:
Adrian D. Purnell
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Marshall et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
Alvin James Johnson, Horace D. Webster, Michael Q. Greer and others
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall and Gina Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
