Cases 41 - 50 of 1,369
Britton v. Davis et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Fernandez Britton, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Davis and Officer Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Shaw et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Steven Demote King
Defendant:
Dr. Shaw, Dr. Stone, K. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Courtney White
Defendant:
William Taylor, Officer Hill and Lt. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Weeks (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Dillon Lee and Dillon Michael Lee
Defendant:
Sgt. Weeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
William Dewayne Dixon
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles and John Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Brown et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Wayne Vanathan Black
Defendant:
Ken Brown, Adero J. Marshall, Derek Portwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lamar Aaron
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Griffith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Jalon D. Jackson
Defendant:
Charlette Griffith, Louis Colley, Terri Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer-El v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jerome Greer-El
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn, COI Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00702
Plaintiff:
John Edward White
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
