Cases 101 - 110 of 4,316
Daniels v. Watson (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Dr. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Dewon Clarniel Jones
Defendant:
YesCare Corp. and Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Marion County Jail (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
John Paul Burnett
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryles v. Logan et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Heath Taylor, William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rumph v. Thomas et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Rumph
Defendant:
Nurse Thomas and Nurse Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smithart et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
L.B. Smithart, Ben C. Reeves, Rebecca G. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Laster et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Captain Laster, Lt. Langley, Sgt. Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ventress Correctional Facility, Karen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Boyd et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Theron Evan Riley, Jr.
Defendant:
Kendrick Boyd, James Shephard, Antonio McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Parker et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Frederick Antonio Ford
Defendant:
Anthony Parker and Travis Yielder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
