Cases 161 - 170 of 4,316
Franklin v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Andy Franklin
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Josh Lawson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Powell
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Donald Hill
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael Griffin
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
James Tillery
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adams
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sikes v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Sikes, III
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peacock v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Caleb Peacock
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
