Cases 41 - 50 of 261
Stackhouse v. Sewell et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Captain Howard, Morris Rogers, Lt. Sewell and others
Plaintiff:
Glen A. Stackhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Speaks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Captain Johnson, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Cargle et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00328
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Warden Cargle, Lt. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
John Willie Malone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumpers v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Alan D. Bumpers
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00301
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Richard Talley and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Taylor Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
Charco A. Hawkins and Charco Arlando Hawkins
Defendant:
Anthony Edwards, Captain Tuck, Bill Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Captain Carter, Patrice Richie Jones, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00246
Defendant:
Captain Smiley, Captain Carter, LaCharla Kirksey and others
Plaintiff:
LaMichael LaCorey Stone and JaMichael LaCorey Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00105
Defendant:
Michael Hill, Bill Franklin, Captain Tuck and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Jones et al (INMATE 2) (MEMBER)
as 2:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Captain Dansby, Lt. Jones and Dominic Jones
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jerome Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
