Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 141 - 150 of 4,236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
McIntosh v. Opp City Police Dept et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00505
Plaintiff: Rebecca Y. McIntosh
Defendant: Opp City Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00500
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Richard v. Max Credit Union et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff: Chauncy Richard
Defendant: Max Credit Union, Martin Head, Chambless Math and Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00488
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Masingo v. McCartney et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff: Jason Masingo
Defendant: Corry McCartney and Matthew Foshee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Laakkonen v. Bailes
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff: Patrick Laakkonen
Defendant: Shane Bailes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIntosh v. Ragland et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00470
Plaintiff: Rebecca Y. McIntosh
Defendant: Camron Ragland, Thomas Price, Mark Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?