Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,259
Hardy v. Barnes
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff: Jacquelyn Hardy
Defendant: Lee Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raley v. Pitts et al
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff: Johnnie L. Raley
Defendant: Jonathan Pitts, Clay Conway, Mike Cheshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 120711 Americans with Disabilities Act
Damon et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00335
Plaintiff: Damon Damon, Damon Ricardo Brown and Christie Damon
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sewell v. Maddox et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff: Amy Giles Sewell
Defendant: Thomas N Maddox, City of Elba, Alabama and Harold L. Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sims v. Starr et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff: Allan D. Sims, Jr.
Defendant: Laura Starr, Deputy McCoulough, Judge Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeLano v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff: James DeLano
Defendant: Stephanie M. Azar, Jean W. Brown, Alabama Select Network, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hardy v. Bell (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff: Jacquelyn Hardy
Defendant: William A. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen v. Flowers (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Tenika McQueen
Defendant: Felicia Franklin Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?