Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Avery v. Sims et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
Walter Jamar Avery
Defendant:
Officer Sims, Sgt. Theodore and Ms. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Bolling et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Adrian Stewart
Defendant:
Leon Bolling and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bivins v. Stewart et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Raymond Andrew Bivins
Defendant:
Cynthia Stewart and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bolden v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Bolden
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Cynthia Stewart, Kenneth Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Shannon Taylor
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Administration of the Chambers County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Larry Bradford Moore
Defendant:
Administration of the Chambers County Sheriff's Department , Sid Lockhart , Clay Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Chambers County Detention Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2016cv00944
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Moss
Defendant:
Chambers County Detention Facility, Melody Nutt, Nurse Jo Jo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2016cv00866
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn , Anne Adams Hill and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00767
Plaintiff:
James Kendall Stewart
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Jefferson S. Dunn, Ms. Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Stewart et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00753
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
Luther Strange and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
