Cases 31 - 40 of 205
Dean v. Chadwick et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00990
Defendant:
James Sanders, Michael Chadwick, Cody Evert Evan and others
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatten v. Chadwick et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv00998
Defendant:
John Crawford, Michael Chadwick, Cody Evan and others
Plaintiff:
Quincey Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00950
Defendant:
Dwayne Spurlock, Leigh Gwathney and Cliff Walker
Plaintiff:
Irby James Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinchon v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Kay Ivey, Leigh Gwathney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Pinchon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troupe v. Matthews et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00868
Defendant:
Bradley Walker, Johnnie Mae Matthews and Alabama Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James Troupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culver v. Valenza et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2020cv00769
Plaintiff:
Victor Jandell Culver
Defendant:
Austin Arnold, Greg Lee, Angelica Black and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holliman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, City, County, Commission of Elmore County, Alabama, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Holliman, Richard Clay Martin, Aloysius Thaddeus Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00833
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Curtis Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiarizio v. Murrill et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Karla Walker Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
