Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Smith v. Warren et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00371
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Smith
Defendant:
David Warren, Tommy Miller, Micheal Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles v. Warren et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
Glen A. Nettles
Defendant:
David Warren, Tommy Miller, Leon Sullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Warren et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Willie James Jackson
Defendant:
David Warren, Tommy Miller, Micheal Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Clark et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00077
Defendant:
Sheriff Clark, Sheriff Wayne, Mayor of Macon County and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Garrett et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2011cv01121
Plaintiff:
Moses Tirell Baker
Defendant:
Stanley Garrett, Mike Rodgers, E. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Opelika Chief of Police, et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2011cv00943
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Roberts
Defendant:
Lee County, Lee County Sheriff Dept, Jay Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. United States of America (INMATE3)
as 2:2011cv00885
Plaintiff:
Sidney Eugene Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Clarke et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Johnny Materous Williams
Defendant:
Malvin Clarke, David Warren, Kalia Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Highfill v. Opelika Police Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Shane Louis Highfill
Defendant:
Opelika Police Department, Stanley Garret, Brantley Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
