Cases 51 - 60 of 8,754
Frazier v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail and T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackmon v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jareece Edward Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villafana v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Villafana
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Nicki M. McFerrin, Justin Louvorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Johnson (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Randy Steward
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alonso
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
