Cases 1 - 10 of 473
Brown v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Carvell Tony Brown
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Captain Walker, Lt. Corcino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Houston Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Sgt. Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Charles McCrory
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herring v. Willison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
John William Herring, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Willison and Officer Frooster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowart v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Cowart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guevara v. Keyes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Guevara
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
