Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Morris v. Mims-Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Morris and Calvin Morris
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mims-Harris, Officer Emerson, Lt. Mims-Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oryang v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Billy Mitchum, Dr. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Elmore Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00487
Defendant:
Sgt. Presley, Lt. Norman, Lieutenant Tippins and others
Plaintiff:
Kentrell Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00364
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Henline (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00361
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gann v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00363
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00362
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00356
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00358
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
