Cases 1 - 10 of 8,754
Oliver v. Ward et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Cam Ward, Leigh Gwanthney, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weingrad v. Keyes (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ari P. Weingrad
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pitts v. Herbert et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pitts
Defendant:
Angel Herbert, Burton Dunn, Vanessa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Whittle et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Chris Whittle and Officer Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Marenzo Marquis Roberts
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Isiah Davis
Defendant:
Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
