Cases 91 - 100 of 429
Holliman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, City, County, Commission of Elmore County, Alabama, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Holliman, Richard Clay Martin, Aloysius Thaddeus Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00789
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Harris
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Tim Forte, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devold v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00755
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Gerrad Montrez Devold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00738
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Theortheli Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00719
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Theortheli Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00703
Plaintiff:
Toree Jones
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00648
Plaintiff:
James Edward Holland
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00641
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00642
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey, Reosha Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00643
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Deon Alexander
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
