Cases 31 - 40 of 920
Jones v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Kim Willingham, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Terry Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hershiser v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jack Dennison Hershiser
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Elmore Correctional Facility, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggins v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Riggins
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Teresa Norman, Mr. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Roger Jay Jones, II
Defendant:
Courtney B. Rogers and Officer Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Cameron and Leslie Dewayne Cameron
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Warden Thompkins, Warden Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jacoby v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brown
as 2:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Patrion Austin Jones
Defendant:
Michael Ryan Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.