Cases 31 - 40 of 22,062
Ramey v. Askew et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Chaplain Askew, Sgt. Salter, Antonio McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sylvester v. Rowlins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rowlins and Jimmie Brayboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. City of Clanton Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Turner
Defendant:
City of Clanton Alabama, Chilton County, Alabama, Austin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. Ward et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Cam Ward, Leigh Gwanthney, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester v. Rowlins (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rowlins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Wes Allen
Defendant:
Saul Douglas Smith and The Principal Campaign Committee of Saul Douglas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Montgomery Real Estate LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Montgomery Real Estate LLC doing business as Rapid Fire Home Buyers, Jessica Avant and Bobby Dean
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Municipality of Dothan v. Hammond
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Municipality of Dothan
Defendant:
Ketavious Javon Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
