Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Watson et al v. Bailey et al
as 2:2015cv00880
Plaintiff:
Kayla Watson , P. M. and M. W.
Defendant:
Russell Michael Bailey and Centurion-Eagle Auto Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reproductive Health Services, et al. v. Strange, et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
Reproductive Health Services and June Ayers
Defendant:
Luther Strange and Daryl D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bailey v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Dana Bailey
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2013cv00671
Plaintiff:
Randy Eugene Bailey
Defendant:
Mike Rogers, Brantley Cargill and Stanley Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Peavy, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Bailey
Defendant:
Larry Peavy and Sgt. Teal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Montgomery County Commission et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Andert Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Montgomery County Commission, D. T. Marshall, Wanda Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Meeks, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00439
Plaintiff:
William Bailey
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Dr. McWatters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Patterson et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
James William Bailey, IV
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
