Cases 61 - 70 of 137
McCrary v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Frankie McCrary
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Mike Hubbard, Wanda Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nellon v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Prince Nellon
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Mike Hubbard, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M. J. W. et al v. Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
M. J. W. , Cortney Williams and Michael Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. , Central Alabama OB-GYN Associates, P.A. , Christopher Duggar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Carey v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00599
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Warden Richie , Warden Myers , Lieutenant Tomkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Wilson et al (INTAKE 2)
as 2:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Angela Wilson, Cathy Brown, Nathaniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook Bey v. Strickland et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00520
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cook Bey
Defendant:
Michael Strickland, Andre Jackson and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prude v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Franklin Prude
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Walter Myers, Sgt. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaffin v. Willmann(JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 1:2016cv00400
Plaintiff:
Heath Chaffin
Defendant:
Elaine Cook Willmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook Bey v. Luckie et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00307
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cook Bey
Defendant:
Camille Luckie, Leeposey Daniels and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Cooks et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Raymond Turner
Defendant:
Mary Cooks , Luther Strange and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.