Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Arrington v. Strickland et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
James Augustus Arrington
Defendant:
Nurse Strickland , Nurse Bailey , Corporal Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Hill et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00818
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Houston
Defendant:
S. Hill and Officer Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd et al v. Moore et al
as 1:2009cv00272
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Todd, III, Michael D. Brock, James R. Paxton and others
Defendant:
John Moore, John Moore, Bruce Snead and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Moore v. Dinnerman et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Hoses R. Moore
Defendant:
William Dinnerman, Bruce Holden, Richard Golden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bailey v. Albright et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2008cv00993
Plaintiff:
Patricia Forest Bailey
Defendant:
Frank Albright, Troy King and State of Alabama, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Bates et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00965
Plaintiff:
Willie James Wright
Defendant:
Dr. Bates, Nurse Stricklen and Nurse Bailey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Marcus et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00568
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Brenda Marcus, Lewis Boyd, Warden Hope and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bass v. Brantley et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00469
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lemuel Bass
Defendant:
M. E. Brantley, A. J. Hardy and Officer Bailey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00362
Plaintiff:
John E. White
Defendant:
Richard Allen, D. T. Marshall, D. T. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Neill v. Drew et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
Donald Craig O'Neill
Defendant:
Darlene A. Drew, G. K. Bailey and David A. Thompson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
