Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Empire Financial Services, Inc. v. Todd et al
as 1:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Empire Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Todd, III, Michael D. Brock, James R. Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
United States of America v. Bailey
as 2:2008mc03399
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Herbert Lee Bailey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
King v. Oliver et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv01072
Plaintiff:
Yuself King
Defendant:
Terrell Oliver, C.O. I Bennett, C.O. I Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitlow v. Bailey et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2007cv00960
Plaintiff:
Sonja Elaine Whitlow
Defendant:
Judge Bailey, Sally Heard and Officer Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Finley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00951
Plaintiff:
John E. White
Defendant:
Lt. Finley and Nurse Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey et al v. Chambers et al
as 3:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bailey, Curtis Bailey, Allison Bailey and others
Defendant:
William Bert Chambers, III and Carthage Marine Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flowers v. Montgomery City Jail et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00553
Plaintiff:
Calvin Flowers
Defendant:
Montgomery City Jail, Officer McKenzie, Officer McKray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bailey v. Astrue (CONSENT)
as 3:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Janice Bailey
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
