Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cloyd v. The Town of Newton, Alabama (CONSENT)
as 1:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
RaeMonica Cloyd
Defendant:
The Town of Newton, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311
Newton v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
Gary Newton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prosser et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Prosser, Brooke Prosser, Fred Rush and others
Defendant:
B. T. Roberts, Clark Sahlie, James W. Rane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Patrick Nichols, David Blietz, Nell Motley and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Newton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ray Ford Newton and Mary Sue Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ray Ford Newton and Mary Sue Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Newton, et al v. State of Alabama, et al(PANEL)(MEMBER)
as 2:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Newton , Alabama Democratic Conference , Framon Weaver, Sr. and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama , Robert J. Bentley and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Smith v. Auburn University, et al (MAG+)
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Defendant:
Auburn University, The Auburn University Board of Trustees, Raymond J. Harbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Flowers v. Patrick et al
as 1:2011cv01099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Flowers
Defendant:
Michael Patrick and Town of Newton, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
