Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ash (MAG+)
as 1:2016cv00879
Plaintiff:
Ruth L. Robinson
Defendant:
Shane Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough et al v. The City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Angela McCullough , Marquita Johnson , Kenny Jones and others
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery, Alabama , Ernest N. Finley, Jr. , Kevin Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Richard Christopher Ashe
Defendant:
Karla Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pouncey v. Summerlin et al (MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
Steven Young Pouncey
Defendant:
Chris Summerlin , Susie Peters , Tom Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Adams , Thomas Adams , Jacqueline Alexander and others
Defendant:
Bally Gaming, Inc. , Cadillac Jack, Inc. , IGT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Obama et al (MAG+)
as 3:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Brooks
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, Eddie Brown, Leah Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashe v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2009cv01029
Plaintiff:
James Ashe
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Bobby Bright, Tony's Automotive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldsby et al v. Ash et al
as 2:2009cv00975
Plaintiff:
Sherry Goldsby, Sherry Goldsby, Sherry Goldsby and others
Defendant:
David Ash, Pete Bernier, Connie Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shabazz v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ash-ShaKur Shabazz
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
