Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Oliver v. Ward et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Cam Ward, Leigh Gwanthney, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Josh Lawson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Tristan Tyler Lawson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Parkwood Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00247
Defendant:
Gerald B. Pitts, Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Parkwood Industries, LLC
Plaintiff:
Alex Donovan Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00942
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Officer Cookie, J. Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Stephone D. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00867
Defendant:
Mrs. McCovery, T. Jones, D. Lovejoy and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentell Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00841
Defendant:
Mrs. McCovery, T. Jones, D. Lovejoy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00688
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Bryan Gavins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Tyree Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Jennifer McCovery, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Duane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
