Cases 141 - 150 of 10,771
Jacobson v. O'BRYANT et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
WILLIAM O'BRYANT, Deputy Lusk, Deputy Chief Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Limestone Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gene Walker
Defendant:
Limestone Correctional Facility, Deborah Toney and Officer Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Gordy
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Corey Khalil Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Watkins
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Harris and Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Burns
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Markus OShea Payne
Defendant:
Sherry Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Ross et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Maureen Nicole Adams
Defendant:
Somer Lemere Ross and GEO - ATEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson, Joseph Michael Willoughby, Jonathan W Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Windom et al
as 5:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Henry Clay Smith, .
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Mary B Windom and Jennifer M Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. Sheriff Matt Gentry et al
as 5:2023cv01740
Petitioner:
Mung Sian Kim
Respondent:
Sheriff Matt Gentry and Judge Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Preston v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv01769
Plaintiff:
Charles Price Preston
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
