Cases 51 - 60 of 140
Privett v. Ivey et al
as 5:2020cv01202
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Kay Ivey
Plaintiff:
Royce Eugene Privett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duck v. Ivey et al
as 5:2020cv01205
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, William Streeter, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Duck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Alabama Department of Corrections, The et al
as 5:2020cv01204
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Corrections, The, Deborah Toney and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 4:2020cv01176
Plaintiff:
William T Walker
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00844
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Officer Greene, E Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Mental Health Specialist et al
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
Q Jackson, J Stephens, M Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv00813
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00595
Defendant:
Joe Danzey, Alabama Department of Corrections and Larry McCovery
Plaintiff:
James Edward Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Sanders et al
as 2:2020cv00809
Defendant:
C Sanders, Alabama Department of Corrections, K Roy and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 5:2020cv00577
Plaintiff:
Quintareus Lajerry Keith
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
