Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Dotson v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03112
Plaintiff:
David Keith Dotson
Defendant:
James Baker, Courtney Ransom, Tom Watson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Lawrence County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2010cv01800
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Lawrence County Sheriffs Department, James Baker and Gene Mitchell
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelso v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
Rocky Marquis Kelso
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell and James Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrison v. Baker et al
as 5:2008cv01407
Plaintiff:
Steven Harrison, Sr.
Defendant:
James Baker and Lawrence County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swoopes v. Baker
as 5:2008cv01406
Plaintiff:
James Albert Swoopes
Defendant:
James Baker and Matt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Metcalf et al v. Osborn et al
as 5:2007cv01979
Plaintiff:
Ivan Quintel Metcalf and Joseph Wofford
Defendant:
Jim Osborn, Gene Mitchelle, Kenneth Mitchelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wofford v. Osborn et al
as 5:2007cv01982
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gibbs Wofford and Ivan Metcalf
Defendant:
Jim Osborn, Gene Mitchelle and James Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2007cv01232
Plaintiff:
Ivan Quintel Metcalf
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker and Tim Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Lawrence County, Alabama et al
as 5:2007cv01011
Plaintiff:
Clyde O'Neal Parker
Defendant:
Lawrence County, Alabama, Gene Mitchell, Kenneth Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolding v. Baker et al
as 5:2007cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Bolding
Defendant:
James Baker and Lawrence County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
