Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Davis v. Davenport et al
as 4:2012cv02044
Petitioner:
Glennie Dee Davis
Respondent:
Carter F Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 4:2012cv01927
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc and Ruth Naglich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
Tamara Dee Mitchell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dees v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2010cv00892
Plaintiff:
Janet R Dees
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dee v. Freeman et al
as 7:2009cv01602
Plaintiff:
Angelo Yatzie Dee
Defendant:
Freddie Freeman, Cheryl Price, Dwayne Esteese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driskill et al v. Freeman et al
as 7:2009cv01513
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Samuel Driskill, Jr., Harry Banchi, William Elder Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Freddie Freeman, Cherly Price, Dwayne Esteese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smiley v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv08020
Petitioner:
Jimmy Dee Smiley
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
