Cases 41 - 50 of 323
Ikner v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections
as 7:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Tamarcus James Ikner, Sr
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Peterson et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ray Watts
Defendant:
Kenneth Peterson and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2021cv01653
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Horton
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Steven T Marshall and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Ward et al
as 5:2021cv01458
Plaintiff:
Mario Taylor
Defendant:
Sen. Cam Ward, Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01450
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ernest Rogers
Defendant:
Alabama, State of and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv01324
Plaintiff:
Lamar Rydell Norman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, M Charley and C Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bulger v. Ruthledge et al
as 7:2021cv01115
Plaintiff:
Markist Bulger
Defendant:
Ruthledge, Jimmie Thomas, Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Surles v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Alabama Department of Corrections, Limestone Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Speaks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Keller Speaks, Randy Brown, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
