Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Sanchez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
Delfino Gonzalez Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John T Rathman and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Maximino-Gonzalez v. City of Alabaster, Alabama
as 2:2012cv02486
Defendant:
City of Alabaster, Alabama
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Maximino-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Pablo's Restaurante & Cantina Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01898
Plaintiff:
Maria Gonzalez Garcia
Defendant:
Pablo's Restaurante & Cantina Inc , Pablo's II Inc , Pablo's III LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez v. GTI Construction Inc
as 2:2012cv01688
Plaintiff:
Roberto Padillo Gonzalez
Defendant:
GTI Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hernandez et al v. Cafe Iz LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00969
Plaintiff:
Sandra Macado Hernandez and Felipa Gonzalez Navarrette
Defendant:
Cafe Iz LLC , Mary Bruno Reed , Galactic Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Romero et al v. El Olmeca Enterprises Inc et al
as 5:2011cv02837
Plaintiff:
Daisy Romero and Juan Carlos Palomino
Defendant:
El Olmeca Enterprises Inc and Jamie Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Diaz v. Holder et al
as 4:2011cv02804
Petitioner:
William Gonzalez Diaz
Respondent:
Eric Holder, C. Lopez, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Rivera et al
as 2:2011cv01660
Plaintiff:
Heidy Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joel Rivera and Rivera Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gonzalez v. Sukho Thai, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03455
Plaintiff:
Raul Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sukho Thai, Inc. and Lek Tiemkongkanchana
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
