Cases 61 - 70 of 128
Lowrance v. Bentley et al
as 2:2014cv02316
Plaintiff:
Roger Deon Lowrance
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Amerson et al
as 1:2014cv01862
Plaintiff:
Everett Leon Stout
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Brian McVeigh, Leon Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippen v. Bentley et al
as 6:2014cv01787
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pippen
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01774
Plaintiff:
Jon Johnson
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron-Brush et al v. Bentley et al
as 2:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
April Aaron-Brush and Ginger Aaron-Brush
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Luther Strange , Julie Magee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howlet v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Howlet
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00737
Plaintiff:
Gaaron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Charlette Tesmer and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Hill et al
as 2:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Willie Thigpen
Defendant:
Christian Hill, Hart, Cheryl Price and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
