Cases 71 - 80 of 406
Files v. Giddens et al
as 2:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Ryan Rumsey, John Edward Rochester, Julian M King and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest James Files, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad
Sisk v. Fedorovych et al
as 5:2020cv00620
Defendant:
Maks Express Inc, Sergii Fedorovych, Bobby King and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Dwight Sisk, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Leigh King Norton & Underwood LLC v. Regions Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00591
Plaintiff:
Leigh King Norton & Underwood LLC
Defendant:
Regions Financial Corporation and Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kings Creek Apparel LLC v. Wakefields Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00573
Defendant:
Wakefields Inc, William M. Wakefield and Wakefields Inc doing business as Martins Family Clothing doing business as Wakefields Department Stores
Plaintiff:
Kings Creek Apparel LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Peoples v. Bahakel et al
as 5:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Roy Moore, T Todd, Robert Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Peoples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Jani-King Franchising Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00481
Defendant:
Jani-King Franchising Inc, TLS Cleaning Service LLC, Toreon Sears and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Palmer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
