Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Williams v. Alexander et al
as 5:2017cv01962
Plaintiff:
James Otis Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Darren Alexander, Jane Smith, McDaniel and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Smith et al
as 5:2014cv01365
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal
Defendant:
James P Smith and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Redstone Federal Credit Union et al
as 5:2014cv01296
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal
Defendant:
Redstone Federal Credit Union, C. Howard Grisham, James P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America
as 6:2014cv08006
Petitioner:
James Allen Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
O'Neal v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal
Defendant:
State of Alabama and James P Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
O'Neal v. Smith et al
as 5:2013cv02312
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal
Defendant:
James P Smith , Robert V Woods, Jr, Nicole L Schrorer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Morgan County Jail Medical Department
as 5:2011cv01534
Plaintiff:
James Albert Smith, III
Defendant:
Morgan County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
