Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Baker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2015cv01052
Plaintiff:
Michael James Baker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lauhoff v. Lawrence County, Alabama et al
as 5:2014cv00614
Plaintiff:
Aubry Lauhoff
Defendant:
Lawrence County, Alabama , Gene Mitchell , James Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Letson et al v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Dan Waylan Letson and Michael Letson
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker, Johnny Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2011cv02777
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daryl Knight
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker and Anthony Johnson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2011cv02692
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Horton
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell and James Baker
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Baker et al
as 5:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Waylen Craig Bradford
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boglin v. Baker
as 5:2010cv03569
Plaintiff:
Vincent Earl Boglin
Defendant:
James Baker
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swann v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03357
Plaintiff:
Lucas Coy Swann
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Blevins v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2010cv03216
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Blevins
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker and Dr Bates
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03217
Plaintiff:
Waylen Craig Bradford
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
