Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Watson v. Wexford Health Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Jason LaBruce Watson, Jr
Defendant:
Wexford Health Inc, Alabama Dept of Corrections, Limestone County CF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Ivey et al
as 5:2020cv01151
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Corrections, Governor Kay Ivey, Commissioner Jefferey Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Carson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oryang v. Mitchum et al
as 2:2019cv01615
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Alabama Dept of Correction et al
as 7:2019cv00480
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane Green
Defendant:
Loxley Work Center/Release, Alabama Dept of Correction, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharifi v. Commissioner Ala Dept of Corrections
as 5:2017mc01604
Petitioner:
Mohammad Sharifi
Respondent:
Commissioner Ala Dept of Corrections
Davis v. Abston et al
as 7:2015cv01299
Plaintiff:
Marvin Davis, Jr
Defendant:
David Abston and Alabama Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summerville v. Ala Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02459
Petitioner:
Eric Enman Summerville
Respondent:
Ala Dept of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis v. Alabama Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02388
Petitioner:
Eugene Curtis
Respondent:
Alabama Dept of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferguson et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv02396
Plaintiff:
Cecil M Ferguson and William W Horsman, III
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Alabama Dept of Corrections , DeWayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Alabama Dept of Corrections
as 6:2014cv01527
Plaintiff:
Israel Bates, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
