Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Berger v. 22nd State Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
The State of Alabama
Not Yet Classified:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
22nd State Bank, Christopher Watkins, FEB Bancshares Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. City of Selma, Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Debra Jackson , The Estate of Bill Jackson , The Estate of Keoshia Hill and others
Defendant:
City of Selma, Alabama , William T. Riley, III , Sgt. Fulford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windham v. City of Fairhope et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tina Diane Windham
Defendant:
City of Fairhope , Trent Scott , Damian Rehorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program v. Pafenbach et al
as 1:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program
Defendant:
John Pafenbach, Glenn L. Hodge, Michelle Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bill Salter Advertising, Inc. v. Baldwin County, Alabama et al
as 1:2008cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bill Salter Advertising, Inc., Bill Salter Advertising, Inc. and Bill Salter Advertising, Inc.
Defendant:
Baldwin County, Alabama, Baldwin County, Alabama, Baldwin County Commission District 3 Planning & Zoning Board and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bill Salter Advertising, Inc. v. City of Brewton, Alabama
as 1:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Bill Salter Advertising, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Brewton, Alabama, City of Brewton, Alabama, City of Brewton, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
