Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doe v. Spring Hill College et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Spring Hill College, Craig McVey, William Robert Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tucker v. Penn et al
as 1:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Claire Andrews, Essie Godbolt and Craig Penn
Plaintiff:
Raven S Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig et al v. The City of Mobile et al
as 1:2018cv00547
Plaintiff:
Karen Lucky and Selena Craig
Defendant:
Willie Baker, The City of Mobile and Ivan Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mykins v. Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) et al
as 1:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Rosa Mykins
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) , Thomas James Craig , Jena Jo Michael Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Alabama Power et al
as 1:2009cv00746
Plaintiff:
Hunter L. Todd
Defendant:
Alabama Power, Craig Field Industrial Authority and South Dallas Water Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ecklund v. Alabama Medical Licensing Commission et al
as 1:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dan Leonard Ecklund
Defendant:
Alabama Medical Licensing Commission, Alabama Board of Medical Examiners, Gene G. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
