Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Pruitt v. Howard et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Leviticus Pruitt
Defendant:
Ronzella Howard , Lesleish Dodd, Mr. Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Murphree et al
as 1:2013cv00624
Plaintiff:
Booker T. Johnson
Defendant:
Jo Beth Murphree and John Tyson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollingsworth v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Richard Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Kim T. Thomas, Gary Hetzel, Ronzella Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Bentley et al
as 1:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Nickholas Knight
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim T. Thomas, Mary Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
Cedric Floyd
Defendant:
Grover Smith, Matthew Hammonds, Stephen M. Billy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Mobile County Metro Jail
as 1:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Demetric Hooper
Defendant:
Mobile County Metro Jail, B. T. Hines, K. L. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reutcke v. Mobile County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
John T. Reutcke
Defendant:
Sam Cochran, Michael Haley, Corizon Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Bentley et al
as 1:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson, Otis Brown and Ronald Harris
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Callie T. Dietz and Charlie Graddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. Barber et al
as 1:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Sekou T. Rudolph
Defendant:
Pamela Barber, Debra Poindexter, Donny Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. City of Thomasville et al
as 1:2012cv00249
Plaintiff:
Randy Murphy
Defendant:
City of Thomasville, Thomasville Chief of Police, Maurice Dyess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
