Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Stephens v. Robinson et al
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Todd Stephens
Defendant:
Clifton Robinson, Victoria Boone, Sharon Langhum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ennis v. Bolling et al
as 1:2020cv00366
Respondent:
Steve Marshall and Leon Bolling
Petitioner:
Stephen Gerard Ennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barlow v. Wexford Health Provider et al
as 1:2020cv00342
Defendant:
Wexford Health Provider and Stephen M. Billy
Plaintiff:
Shannon Dean Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Hudson et al
as 1:2020cv00104
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Christopher Rivers
Petitioner:
Stephen J.H. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barlow v. Billy et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Dr. Barfield, William C Teague, Wex-Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Dean Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. USA
as 1:2016cv00186
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stephen Laurence Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
Cedric Floyd
Defendant:
Grover Smith, Matthew Hammonds, Stephen M. Billy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keith v. Atmore Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Toney Maurice Keith
Defendant:
Atmore Police Department, Stephen Billingsley & Company and Escambia County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nodine v. USA
as 1:2012cv00302
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stephen Daniel Nodine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
