Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Pate v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richard Pate
Defendant:
Southern Energy Homes, Inc. and Suburban, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Harris v. Stringer
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Danita L. Harris
Defendant:
Richard Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skipper v. Markel American Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Richard Skipper
Defendant:
Markel American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Luckey v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Tyran Luckey
Defendant:
Health Jackson, Richard Hetrick, Melissa Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braxton et al v. Stokes et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Patrick Braxton, James Ballard, Barbara Patrick and others
Defendant:
Haywood Stokes, III, Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Merritt, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Davis v. Hetrick
as 1:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Davis William Nelson and William N. Davis
Respondent:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Hetrick
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Joseph Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Hetrick
as 1:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Johnathan M. Parker
Respondent:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luckey v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Tyran Luckey
Defendant:
Health Jackson and Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
